which of the following countries possesses a high degree of assertiveness

The most common definition of assertiveness is the ability to take control of situations. However, a lack of assertiveness may result in losing trust and respect. Assertiveness lies between passive and aggressive responses. Here are some characteristics of assertiveness.


The score for Mexico is 97, which indicates that this nation’s culture is primarily normative. This type of culture is characterized by people who tend to indulge themselves in the good things in life. They are also more optimistic and value their leisure time. In addition, Mexicans place a high value on personal freedom. They often spend their money the way they want.

Assertiveness is a measure of a person’s willingness to be direct and assertive. In contrast, passiveness is the opposite of aggressiveness. When a person feels threatened by their boss or peers, they are less likely to speak up. Assertiveness is important to achieving work goals and establishing personal relationships.

Women in Mexico often internalize their problems, which can contribute to self-esteem issues. This is especially problematic in Mexico, where women tend to be subordinated to men. As a result, women may feel self-conscious and ashamed of themselves. This internalizing of problem behaviors may be further complicated by socialization into machismo.


Pakistan is a country surrounded by stunning mountains, and the capital city is Islamabad. Other major cities include Lahore, Peshawar, and Rawalpindi. The majority of its population is Muslim, and the national language is Urdu. The country also has a large Pashtun-speaking population. Public institutions dominate the economy, though leaders are trying to privatize some industries. The country also places great emphasis on interpersonal relationships.

Pakistan is a predominantly masculine culture. Consequently, the country’s leaders tend to demonstrate strong task and relationship behaviors. Leaders must also be clear about what they want from their followers, and this means defining expectations and goals before they can be achieved. In Pakistani society, this means spelling out roles and responsibilities in a clear manner. This helps to reduce uncertainty.

In the corporate world, a high degree of assertiveness is required to win a deal. For example, managers must spend time building relationships and establishing confidence. Then, only after they have established credibility do they conduct formal meetings. In addition, the Pakistani social structure is built around the joint family system. The result is that Pakistani organization cultures reflect the authoritarian structure of their country’s political system and the centralized decision-making styles of the state. Hence, managers must adapt their management styles to reflect this cultural difference.


Assertiveness is a trait that describes a person’s ability to direct his or her emotions. This trait is important in situations where someone else wants something. For instance, an employee wants a ten percent pay increase, but needs to get approval from the boss. If the boss does not want to pay the increase, the employee may use a more direct method of communicating her or his feelings.

However, high levels of assertiveness can have negative consequences. They can lead to negative interpersonal interactions and undermine instrumental outcomes, thereby reducing relationships and impairing one’s well-being. If the person in a given situation is overly assertive, it may be time to reduce their level of assertiveness.

People with high assertiveness may display a variety of behaviors in a variety of situations. These behaviors may be more aggressive or less aggressive than others. In either case, it is important to keep in mind that some forms of assertiveness are learned and can be improved with training. However, not everyone is aware of how they are perceived, and feedback is not always forthcoming. Therefore, it is important to have a system in place that offers explicit feedback about the individual’s assertiveness. This can be useful when coupled with a coaching process.

Individual differences in motivations are an important factor in explaining the different forms of assertiveness. In the context of negotiations, assertiveness can be described as a range of behaviors that vary from pressing for more to compromising on terms.

Mediterranean country averages fall in the Expressive style quadrant

The Mediterranean region spans parts of three continents and is densely populated, with a variety of ethnic groups. It is considered a region of complex climate and ecosystems, and it is home to 21 countries. These countries have climates that range from moderately cold to hot and dry in winter.

Western European culture averages fall in the Responsive style quadrant

According to the Pew Research Center, Western European cultures tend to be more responsive to technology. This is due in part to their strong political pluralism, individualism, and proliferation of sub and counter-cultures. Additionally, human migration and globalization are leading to a greater degree of cultural syncretism.

Western European culture averages fall in the Individualistic style quadrant

The findings of the study challenge the belief that Western Europeans are the only people with individualistic tendencies. While Westerners are more independent, Asian cultures are more collective. The differences between these cultures are rooted in their individualistic tendencies. For example, the United States has a higher individualistic tendencies than other western countries.

In 2007, the average Western European culture was in the Individualistic style quadrant. This suggests a country’s overall individualism and structural cohesion is relatively weak. This trend is reflected in the recent rise in European Union (EU) individual cohesion, against the backdrop of recent crises and divisive public debates. The Individualistic style has a higher potential for short-term growth than structural cohesion, with divergent trends across countries in the EU. Similarly, Engagement is a highly volatile but relatively stable indicator.

Despite a shared history, political discourse, institutions, and practices, Western Europeans differ greatly. According to a famous axiom of cultural psychology, mind and culture are interdependent, and as such, each influences the other. Since this is true, the common ground between European cultures should help shape the mind and identity of Europeans. This Special Issue will explore these common ground and the role of culture and identity in shaping European societies.

Chelsea Glover