which global entry strategy has the highest degree of risk

In addition to the traditional strategy of acquisition, some multinational organizations choose to engage in full-scale production and marketing in a foreign country. Clearwater Seafood, for example, owns a wholly-owned Scottish subsidiary, Macduff, and has been able to expand its business internationally by making this move. This strategy entails a higher investment and a thorough understanding of the business environment of the foreign country.


Piggybacking is a marketing strategy where a brand partners with a more established firm to sell their products. This helps the brand get more exposure, and it works best if the time is right. If the partner company is experiencing increased commercial activity, the brand will be able to reach a larger market faster. However, if the firm is not doing as well, the partnership could lead to damage to both businesses.

Piggyback marketing works by partnering with other companies that have complementary products. The car company, for instance, can promote a tire company’s product in a relevant market. Likewise, many companies are willing to share digital content with a partner company, allowing them to reach a larger audience. This is especially beneficial for small businesses looking to expand their presence in a particular region.


If your company is considering global expansion, it is important to know which type of strategy will best suit your business objectives. There are several entry methods available for companies, including licensing and joint ventures. Licensing is the least expensive option, but it requires a long-term commitment. In addition, it can tarnish your original product’s brand image if you don’t reproduce it well.

Piggybacking is another approach that involves asking a partner company to sell your product and profit from each sale. This is a great option for new entrants to foreign markets, as they can focus on domestic retail while the partner company handles international marketing. Another option is to offer a bundle of products and services.

Licensing allows your company to use a foreign company’s property, usually intangible. This could include patented technology or production techniques. In return, your company will pay the foreign firm for the rights to use it in the target country. This strategy is especially useful when your target firm is able to secure a large share of the market.

For smaller companies, it might be better to go for a licensing or merger-and-acquisition approach. Smaller companies, however, are often limited to lower commitment entry strategies, such as licensing. For example, if you are planning on launching a new product in a foreign market, you may prefer to license the technology from a competitor.


There are several strategies for global entry, each with its own pros and cons. Choosing the right market to enter is a key part of any strategy. Identifying attractive markets requires extensive research on the ground. The best way to reduce the risk is to make informed decisions regarding market entry. Some strategies may require an initial market entry, while others may involve following competitors that have already achieved success in a certain region. Your decision should depend on your risk tolerance and the stage of your company.

One of the best ways to minimize the risk of entering a foreign market is to form a joint venture. This method allows you to compete more aggressively in that country than if you entered the market on your own. But be warned: joint ventures may create a potential power imbalance. To avoid this risk, make sure to establish fair processes between the partners.

A second option is to purchase local products. These strategies often involve piggybacking on the existing network. These deals are ideal for companies that already have a presence in another country. In such a situation, the international company would add its product in exchange for a share of the profit. In this way, the company could focus on domestic retail while the partner takes care of the international marketing. Alternatively, a company could choose to sell its product in a bundled package with another company.


If you are considering entering a new global market, you have to decide which strategy is the most risky. Entering a large market involves investing significant resources to establish a presence. It will give your company the best chance of making a positive impression, but it is risky if the company fails. That’s why some companies advise their clients to avoid large markets such as Germany and Turkey, where competition can be stiff. Your risk appetite and your company’s stage will determine which approach you take.

One of the most common strategies for entry into a foreign market is a joint venture. A joint venture enables two or more companies to share resources, risks, and profits. A joint venture also gives a company flexibility in the local market, including the ability to collaborate on joint product development and comply with local regulations. Furthermore, it allows a company to share political connections and distribution channels.

Piggybacking is another cost-effective way to enter a foreign market. It involves partnering with another company, which already has a market presence in that country. The two companies then work together to cross-sell each other’s products in their home country. This strategy requires minimal capital but requires a high degree of trust. Because the partner company will have control over the marketing and sales abroad, piggybacking can be an attractive option for new entrants.

Another option for entering the international market is to establish a license or joint venture. This method is similar to franchising. This strategy allows a firm to enter a foreign market with much greater vigor. The main benefit of a licensing strategy is that it requires little initial investment and policing. But it also requires a more extensive knowledge of the local business conditions.

The risk level of entering a foreign market can vary widely depending on the size of the target market and the capabilities of the entering company. Smaller firms are often limited to entry modes that require lower commitment.

Chelsea Glover